http://www.adamyoshida.com

www.adamyoshida.com

Tuesday, August 10, 2004

The Coming of a Moslem Canada

When, late last year, it was announced that the Province of Ontario would be allowing courts operating on the principles of Shariah (Islamic) law to settle civil disputes between Moslems, those of us who objected were ridiculed as bigots and racists. After all, what could possibly be wrong with allowing people to operate legally by the dictates of their religion if it cannot harm anyone else? Only someone with a prejudice (an unjustified animus) towards Islam could object, this logic goes.

Of course, this ignores the possibility that someone might have a reasonable animus towards a religion. The argument that any opposition to any religion (except, of course, for opposition to Judaism or Christianity) is somehow inherently immoral is silly. If there were a major world religion which advocated actual cannibalism of babies, ought we accept that religion and its practices based upon our deep belief in the principle of tolerance? Tolerance only stretches so far as the intolerable and then it must go.

We of the West need to pull our heads out of the sand and face up to the real demographic threat that is posed to our civilization by Islam. So long as our own fertility rates remain low and we accept huge numbers of immigrants from high-fertility Islamic nations, we are setting into motion the process of our own destruction. This problem may seem remote in Canada, where Moslems make up only 2.5% of the population but, in reality, it is already knocking upon the door for the way in which are politically correct elites are beholden to minority groups already enables them to punch drastically above their weight.

Can you imagine, twenty years ago, what would have been said if anyone had suggested that, at some point, some form of Shariah law would be enforced in a country like Canada? People would have laughed. Well now, when I warn that the Canadian nation as a whole is in danger of falling into the clutches of Islam, I’m sure people will laugh. Well, we’ll see who’s still laughing in 2030.

The Dangers of Islam:

I don’t deny that Islam can be benignly practiced and observed: so can pretty much anything. For every Jew-killing Nazi concentration camp guard there was a harmless Nazi shoe-maker in Dresden. Now, I’m not saying that Islam and Nazism are one and the same, but I am saying that Islamism and Nazism are (to corrupt a phrase used by pro-Palestinian activists, “Islamism is Nazism.”). There’s a big difference between Islam the religion and Islamism the political ideology which fuses Islam and Totalitarianism. They are not one and the same: but they are linked. Nowhere in the world will you find Islam without Islamism. Even in places such as the Phillipines and Thailand, far from the supposed Saudi sources of modern terrorism, you’ll find Islamists running about shooting, killing, and murdering as they please.

The reason for this is obvious: Islamism is merely Islam put into practice. If you read your Koran and Hadith and ignore all of the parts which instruct you to beat your wife and kill Jews in order to bring on the end times, then you’ll probably turn out alright. But if you take your Islam seriously and actually accept it as face value, the odds are rather high that you’re eventually going to end up blowing up buses full of Jews and beheading infidels on tape.

An average Moslem is a lot like an average Christian in that they don’t really take the things that their holy books say very seriously. Oh, sure, they might read them from time to time- and they might even pray on a daily basis: but they aren’t actively preparing for the end of time of wishing for a crusade (or Jihad) to wipe all of the unbelievers off the face of the Earth. The difference comes in the “extreme” wings of both religions. As a general rule, a Christian “extremist” these days is someone who opposes technical instructions for homosexual sodomy being distributed to second-graders and a Moslem “extremist” is someone who likes blowing up Pizza restaurants full of Jews.

In other words: Islam is a religion of peace so long as you ignore its core theological tenant which, luckily for us, most observers of any religion tend to do. In 99% of cases the most trouble someone who reads their Bible five hours a day is going to cause will come in the form of their getting arrested for passing of flyers in a “bubble zone” around an abortion clinic. The most trouble someone who reads the Koran five hours a day is likely to cause can be seen on the evening news.

Look: what else would you expect from a religion founded by a murderous pedophile? Yes, a pedophile: what else would you call a man who, at the age of fifty, married a six year-old girl and who then went on to consummate the marriage when she was nine? Should we expect a religion which was spread almost entirely by the sword to, in the age of its long-decline, peacefully co-exist with other religions? Of course not. Given this, we cannot treat it like other religions either.

The Growth of Islam in Canada:

Right now, of course, Moslems in Canada are a small minority- roughly 2 to 2.5% of the population, depending upon whose numbers you believe. But, let me ask you this: what happens when Moslems have grown to be 10% of Canada’s population? Do you think that they will be so benign then? Do you think that they’ll have no demands? Do you think that, if they do have demands, that the Liberals will resist them? The road ahead, to me at least, seems to be the road to the Dhimmitude of Canada.

It isn’t that far off. The 2001 Census (already three years old) claims that there are roughly 580,000 Moslems in Canada. Seeing as how those numbers are not only dated, but also fail to include people who are in the country illegally or who are otherwise interested in not coming to the attention of the authorities, I don’t believe that the Canadian Islamic Congress is lying or exaggerating when it claims that there are 700,000 Moslems in Canada. By way of comparison, there were 253,000 or so Moslems in Canada in 1991 (out of a then-population estimate of twenty-seven million versus about thirty million in 2001). In other words, during a period when the Canadian population grew by roughly 11% the Moslem population of Canada grew roughly 129%. During the same period, the number of Protestants in Canada fell by 1.1 million.

To give you an idea of the scale of Islamic immigration to Canada, in the years 2000, 2001, and 2002 alone the Montreal area absorbed 20,500 immigrants from Morocco, Algeria, Pakistan, and Lebanon alone- immigrants where were likely mostly Moslems. Toronto, in the same three-year period, took in 58,000 immigrants from Pakistan, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia. Even Vancouver (where immigrants hail mostly from Asia and India, took in more than six thousand immigrations from Moslem nations in the same period. When you factor immigrants from other Islamic countries not grouped by name and the obvious fact that some people from predominantly non-Moslem nations (such as the Phillipines) are going to be Moslems, it stands to reason that Canada’s three largest metropolitan areas took in more than 100,000 Moslems in those three years alone.

Given this (and that, as immigration from China and India declines with the rise of economic prospects in both of those nations, Middle Eastern immigration will go up) it would not be at all unreasonable to expect Canada’s Moslem population to maintain the same level of growth in the years 2001-2011 while, over the same period as a whole, Canada’s population would increase only slightly. In other words, the 2011 Census would show a population of about 33.5 million (the actual population would, of course, be higher than the Census figures) with an Islamic population of 1.33 million. In other words, in twenty years Canada’s Moslem population would have increased from just less than 1% of the population to a hair under 4% of the population. If the same trend continued for another ten years, the 2021 census would show a Canadian population of 37.2 million and an Islamic population of 3.05 million. Carried through to 2031, you’d see a Canada with 41.2 million people, seven million of whom (or 17% of the population) would be Moslems. In this scenario, Canada would become an Islamic-majority country somewhere around the year 2045 or so.

Surely this must be impossible? Well, I’m not so sure. The fertility rate for Canada’s aging population is declining and, in the long-term, the only way to maintain our present numbers will be to solicit immigrants and large numbers. At a certain point the trend would become self-sustaining: as increasing numbers of Moslems entered the country they in turn would both have children (who would then have children of their own) and sponsor relatives who in turn would both have children (who would then have more children) and sponsor their relatives. The numbers are not, after all, very big. When you hit a big number like five million or so, then I think that the trend becomes irreversible. When you pit a group of people who refuse to breed (or bring their own relatives along to breed for them) with one which does both, the latter group is going to win out every time. In fact, were I a Moslem leader with a strategic mind, I’d be deliberately encouraging immigration to Canada on the grounds that the Canadian government, of all major Western governments, will probably be the easiest to control and that, because of Canada’s proximity to the United States, control of it would be most rewarding.

Towards and Islamic Canada?:

At what point does Canada begin to fall under the grip of Islam? I’d say that the tipping point comes when Moslems become 20% of the population, which should be roughly twenty years from today if the present rate of increase continues. Obviously 20% does not constitute a majority in and of itself, but that 20% will be tied into the dynamics of the Liberal Party. Exit polls showed that 71% of Moslems who voted in the recent Federal Election voted Liberal and more than 80% turned up to vote. In other words, if Moslems turn out to vote for Liberals at the same rate in the same percentages, then the Liberals will already be assured of 19% of the vote (they won a minority government with about 35% of the vote in the recent election) before any campaigning is done.

The Liberals, of course, will then become increasingly beholden to the Moslem vote and will grant them pretty much whatever they want. An immigration policy which favours Moslems? Certainly. An anti-Israel, anti-American foreign policy: we’ve already got that. What about separate criminal courts for Moslems?

It sounds improbable, but that’s exactly what the recognition of Shariah law has opened the door to. After all, Canada already allows Native Indians to be tried by the bizarre and primitive traditions of their own peoples (“judgement circles” and the like). It doesn’t seem improbable to me that, in the name of cultural sensitivity, eventually they’ll allow Shariah courts to try crimes committed by Moslem against Moslem, and then crimes simply committed by Moslems and then, eventually, crimes committed against Moslems by others.

Another step, of course, will be to make defamation of the “Prophet” Mohammed a crime. It’s already been proposed that it be made an international crime (I fully expect to end up being extradited to the Hague sooner or later), so I imagine that sooner or later someone will propose making it a crime under the Criminal Code of Canada and that our various Barons and Baronesses of multiculturalism and sensitivity will go along.

There’d be exactly one advantage to an Islamic takeover of Canada: the next time Svend Robinson stole a ring, he’d get a lot more than a conditional discharge. If he lived that long, mind you, despite Mrs. Robinson’s shameless and consistent support for various terrorists of the Religion of Peace, I imagine that, if vested with the power of law, they wouldn’t long tolerate his… proclivities. And if they’d cut off his hand for theft, God knows that they’d cut off for the latter!

posted by Yoshi at 6:22 PM

Comments:

Dear Sir, I'm a moslem woman from Indonesia. as a moslem i must respect other people's opinion include you. it's a human right to speak whatever they want eventhough it's include an insult about another religion. i leave you this comment based on your statement about Muhammad is a phedopilia (i apologize for my bad English). have you done the research before you wrote that, sir?
here i give you some statement against your words about Muhammad as a phedophilia complete with the book references that you can check by yourself from library.
Thank you for giving the chance to leave a comment.maybe you will think this is only a garbage, but at least i already did what my right as a human (same as you)..a freedom to speak.

PROOF #1: OUR TESTING TOWARD THE SOURCE
Most of the stories which tell us about this matter were being told only by Hisham ibn `Urwah, who wrote it by the order of his father. There supposed minimal 2 or 3 person who wrote the same story or hadist. It is strange that no one in Medinah, where Hisham ibn `Urwah lived, until his 71 years old, had waited to told about this story, besides the fact that there were a lot of students in Medinah include the famous one Malik ibn Anas, never recorded to tell about this story.
The beginning of this story was from Iraq people, where Hisham stayed there in his old age after moved from Medinah. Tehzibu’l-Tehzib, one of a quite famous book who discuss about the stories from Hadist tellers, according to Yaqub ibn Shaibah has noted : “Hisham is highly trusted, his story possible to accept, EXCEPT the stories he told after he moved to Iraq“(Tehzi’bu’l-tehzi’b, Ibn Hajar Al- ‘asqala’ni, Dar Ihya al-turath al-Islami, 15th century. Vol 11, p.50).
In his next statement Malik ibn Anas denied the stories from Hisham which recorded by Iraq people. (Tehzi’b u’l-tehzi’b, IbnHajar Al- `asqala’ni, Dar Ihya al-turath al-Islami, Vol.11, p. 50).
Mizanu’l-ai`tidal, another book who also discuss as same as Tehzibu’l-tehzib has recorded : “When Hisham got older, his memory had a dramatic fell” (Mizanu’l-ai`tidal, Al-Zahbi, Al-Maktabatu’l-athriyyah, Sheikhupura, Pakistan, Vol. 4, p. 301).
CONCLUSION: based on this reference , Hisham’s memory is very poor and his story after he moved to Iraq is highly unbelievable so his story about the age of Aisyah when she got married to Muhammad is not credible.
KRONOLOGI: It is very important to record and memorized the important dates on history of Islam.
Pra-610 M: Jahiliya (pra- Islamic era) before God’s order is received through Muhammad.
610 M: First God’s words through Muhammad. Abu Bakar receives Islam
613 M: Muhammad started teaching it in his society
615 M: Muhammad moved to Abbysinia
616 M: Umar bin al Khattab receives Islam.
620 M: It is told that Muhammad purposed Aisyah
622 M: Moved to Yathrib, next to be called Medina until now
623/624 M: It is told that Muhammad is married with Aisyah

PROOF#2 : The purposed of Muhammad to Aisyah

According to Tabari (also according to Hisham ibn `Urwah, Ibn Hunbal and Ibn Sad), Aisyah was purposed in her 7 years old and married Muhammad in her 9 years old, but, in another section, Al-Tabari said: “All children of Abu Bakr (4 children) was born in Jahiliyah era from his 2 wives “(Tarikhu’l-umam wa’l-mamlu’k, Al-Tabari (died 922), Vol. 4,p. 50, Arabic, Dara’l-fikr, Beirut, 1979).
If Aisyah was purposed in 620M (7 years old) and married in 623/624 M(9 years old), this indicate that Aisyah was born in 613 M. So based on Al- Tabari’s writing, Aisyah supposed to be born in 613M, which was 3 years after Jahiliyah era is finished (610 M). Tabari also said that Aisyah was born in Jahiliyah era. If Aisyah was born in Jahiliyah era, Aisyah’s age is supposed to minimal 14 years old when she got married. The point is Tabari has contradiction about his story. CONCLUSION: Al-Tabari is not consistent with Aisyah’s age when she got married.
PROOF # 3: Aisyah’s age compared with Fatimah’s age.
According to Ibn Hajar, “Fatima was born when Ka`bah was rebuilt, when Muhammad was 35 years old… Fatimah is 5 years older than Aisyah “(Al-isabah fi tamyizi’l-sahabah, Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, Vol. 4, p. 377, Maktabatu’l-Riyadh al-haditha, al-Riyadh, 1978).
If the statement from Ibn Hajar is actual, it means Aisyah was born when Muhammad was 40 years old. If Aisyah married with Muhammad when he was 52 years old, then her age when she got married was 12 years old.
CONCLUSION: Ibn Hajar, Tabari, Ibn Hisham, dan Ibn Humbal are being contradicted in each other, but it looks obvious that the story about Aisyah got married when she was 7 years old is only a myth.
PROOF #4: Counting Aisyah’s age with Asma’s age
According Abda’l-Rahman ibn abi zanna’d: “Asma is 10 years older than Aisyah (Siyar A`la’ma’l-nubala’, Al-Z.ahabi, Vol. 2, p. 289, Arabic, Mu’assasatu’l-risalah, Beirut, 1992).
According Ibn Kathir: “Asma is 10 years older than her sister [Aisyah]” (Al-Bidayah wa’l-nihayah, Ibn Kathir, Vol. 8, p. 371,Dar al-fikr al-`arabi, > Al-jizah, 1933).
According Ibn Kathir: “Asma saw the murder of her child in 73 H and 5 days after that Asma died. According another sources, she died in next 10 or 20 days after the tragedy, or several days after 20 days, or next 100 days. The most believe is she died in next 100 days. “When Asma died, she was 100 years old” (Al-Bidayah wa’l-nihayah, Ibn Kathir, Vol. 8, p. 372, Dar al-fikr al-`arabi, Al-jizah, 1933).

According Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani: “Asma lived until the age of 100 years and died in 73 or 74 H.” (Taqribu’l-tehzib, Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani,p. 654, Arabic, Bab fi’l-nisa’, al-harfu’l-alif, Lucknow).
According most of the historians, Asma, the oldest sister from Aisyah is 10years older than Aisyah. If Asma died in her 100 years old in 73 H, Asma supposed to be 27 or 28 years old in Hijrah era (622M).
If Asma was 27 or 28 years old in Hijrah era(622 M), in the same time when Aisyah got married, Aisyah supposed to in her 17 or 18 years old.
Based on Hajar, Ibn Katir, and Abda’l-Rahman ibn abi zanna’d, Aisyah’s age when she got married with Muhammad was 19 or 20 years old. In Proof# 3, Ibn Hajar has estimated Aisyah’s age is 12 tahun and in proof #4 Ibn Hajar told against his first estimation that Aisyah’s age is 17 or 18 years old.
So which one is true? 12 or 18 years old..? conclusion : Ibn Hajar is not valid in the story of Aisyah’s age when she got married.
PROOF #5: BADAR War and UHUD
There is a story about the participation of Aisyah in Badr war which is can be found in Moslem Hadist, (Kitabu’l-jihad wa’l-siyar, Part: karahiyati’l-isti`anah fi’l-ghazwi bikafir). Aisyah, when she mentioned about one of the most important moments during her journey in Badar war, said : “when we reached Shajarah”. From this statement, it is obvious that Aisyah was the member of the journey headed to Badar. A story about her participation in Uhud war is mention in Bukhari (Kitabu’l-jihad wa’l-siyar, Part: Ghazwi’l-nisa’ wa qitalihinnama`a’lrijal): “Anas recorded that on the day of Uhud war, people could not stand close to Muhammad and on that day I saw Aisyah and Umm-i-Sulaim from far.” Again, this statement shows the presence of Aisyah in both wars.
Uhud and Badr.
Told by Bukhari (Kitabu’l-maghazi, Bab Ghazwati’l-khandaq wa hiya’l-ahza’b): “Ibn `Umar said that Muhammad didn’t not allow him to participated in Uhud war, because on that time, Ibnu Umar was only 14 years old. But when in Khandaq war, he was 15 years old so Muhammad allowed him to participated in the war.”
Based from the stories, (a) People aged under15 years old will be sent home and not allowed to follow the war, (b) Aisyah followed the Badar war and Uhud war.
CONCLUSION: The participation of Aisyah in Badar war and Uhud war was clearly indicated that she wasn’t 9 years old at that time but at least was 15 years old. Besides, the women who followed their husband to the war was had function, helping and support their husband and not just to be a burden for their husband. This also another proof about the contradiction of Aisyah’s age when she got married.

PROOF #6: Surah al-Qamar (means MOON. Surah is the name of each part in Quran)
According to several stories, Aisyah was born in the 8th year before Hijrah, but according another source in Bukhari, Aisyah is noted saying this: “I am a young girl(jariyah in Arabic)” when Surah Al-Qamar is told through Muhammad(Sahih Bukhari, kitabu’l-tafsir, Part Qaulihi Bal al-sa`atu Maw`iduhum wa’l-sa`atu adha’ wa amarr).
Surat 54 from Quran was told in the 8th year before hijriyah (The Bounteous Koran, M.M. Khatib, 1985), shows that those surah was told in 614 M. If Aisyah started her life with Muhammad when she was 9 years old in 623 M or 624 M, Aisyah was still a baby (sibyah in Arabic) when Surah Al-Qamar is told. Based on the information that mentioned above, Aisyah is a young girl not a baby when Al-Qamar is told. Jariyah, means a young girl (Lane’s Arabic English Lexicon). So , Aisyah, had became a jariyah not sibyah (baby), so she supposed to be in her 6-13 years old in surah Al-Qamar’s era , and based on from that she must be 14-21 years old when got married with Muhammad.
Conclusion: this proof provides the information about the age of Aisyah when she got married.
PROOF #7: Terminology in Arabic language
According the story from Ahmad ibn Hanbal, after the died of Muhammad first wife, Khadijah, Khaulah came to Muhammad and adviced him to remarried again. Muhammad asked him about the option that Khaulah had in his mind and Khaulah said: “You can marry with a virgin (bikr) or a widow (thayyib)”. When Muhammad asked about the identity of the girl who hasn’t married (bikr), Khaulah mentioned the name of Aisyah.
For people who understand Arabic language, they will see that “Bikr” word in Arabic language is not for a young girl with the age of 9 years old. Bikr in the other hand is used for a woman who hasn’t been married and doesn’t have experience in a marriage, as in English language the similar word with it is “virgin”.
So it is clear that the term for Bikr is not for a 9 years old girl. (Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Vol. 6, p. .210,Arabic, Dar Ihya al-turath al-`arabi, Beirut).
PROOF #8. Text Qur’an
All Moslem people agree that Quran is a holy book (as same as the bibble for the Christian) where we will find the answer for all our questions. So we only need to open Quran to find about the answer about Aisyah’s age and her marriage. Is Quran allow or not allow the marriage of 7years old girl?
There is no words which explicitly allow those kind of marriage. There’s words in quran which guides Moslems how to treat and educate orphan children : And do not entrust to those who are weak of judgment the possessions which God has placed in your charge for [their] support; but let them have their sustenance therefrom, and clothe them, and speak unto them in a kindly way. (Qs. 4:5)
And test the orphans [in your charge] until they reach a marriageable age; then, if you find them to be mature of mind, hand over to them their possessions; and do not consume them by wasteful spending, and in haste, ere they grow up. And let him who is rich abstain entirely [from his ward's property]; and let him who is poor partake thereof in a fair manner. And when you hand over to them their possessions, let there be witnesses on their behalf - although none can take count as God does. (Qs. 4:6)
When a child is left by their parents, a Moslem is required to (a)feed them, (b)give them clothes, (c) educate them, and (d) test them about their maturity “reach a marriageable age” before trust them into managing the financial matters. In here very clear that no Moslem will trust a 7 years old girl in managing the financial matters means that 7 years old girl is not capable to married because they haven’t reach the “marriageable age” or mature in physicly and intellectually.
Ibn Hambal (Musnad Ahmad ibn Hambal, vol.6, p. 33 and 99) stated that 9 years old Aisyah was more interested playing with her toys than took a duty as a wife of someone. That’s why it’s hard to believe that AbuBakar, a respectful Moslem would give his very own young girl to be married with 50 years old Muhammad. As same as difficult imagining that Muhammad was marrying a 7 years old girl. Another important duty in guarding the children is to teach them. Let me ask you a question : how many from us believe that we can teach our kids with the satisfaction result when they are still in 7 or 9 years old?? The answer is : Big Zero. Our logic said that it is impossible to teach them perfectly if they are still in very young age. Aisyah’s father, AbuBakr, is a wiser man who will follow what the Quran has stated and WILL NOT give his child to get married because she’s not mature enough. Also Muhammad will strictly refused those kind of marriage because it’s AGAINST the Quran.
Conclusion: The marriage of Aisyah in her 7 years old age is against the statement in Quran about the Marriagable Age. So the story about her marriage with Muhammad when she was 7 years old is only a MYTH.
PROOF #9: The permission in the marriage
A Moslem woman must be asked first about her approval in her marriage. (Mishakat al Masabiah, translation by James Robson, Vol. I, p. 665).
In Islam, the approval from the woman side is a basic condition in leading to a legal marriage. It is beyond our imagination that a smart man like AbuBakr will approve the marriage of his daughter who not eligible enough to give an approval of her marriage. As stated in Hadist, Aisyah is more interested playing with her toys in her 7 years old age.
Conclusion : Muhammad would not marry a 7 years old girl because the girl wasn’t mature enough to approved the wedding, as for Moslem woman who want to get married, the approval from herself is very essential. So there’s only one possibility, Muhammad was married to Aisyah based on her own approval to get married with him, it means at that time Aisyah was mature enough to realize the situation she would face, the marriage between herself and a man named, Muhammad.
SUMMARY: There’s no tradition in Arab to marry their sons or daughters when they still in 7 or 9 years old. Therefore, it’s impossible about the story of Muhammad married with Aisyah when she was 7 or 9 years old. Clearly, the story of Aisyah’s wedding in her 9 year old age by Hisham ibn `Urwah can not be consider as a true story and the story itself against with another stories which already written in some ancient books which I already gave the references above. More far, there’s no reason to accept Hisham ibn `Urwah’s story as a true story when the other experts, include Malik ibn Anas, has stated that the Hisham ibn `Urwah’s story during his stayed in Iraq is not reliable. The comments from Tabari,Bukhari and Muslim show us that between them there’s internal contradiction about the real age of Aisyah when she got married. So, the history about Aisyah’s marriage isn’t reliable because an obvious contradiction was happening between the experts of Islam history. Also in Qur’an itself the marriage of woman or man who still not in their marriageable age is strictly not allow.

# posted by wiweka : Monday, April 02, 2007 11:11:00 PM